CLICK TO ENLARGE
How the insane new Talibani Maoist Butchers, rapists and extortionists massacred and maimed for ever hundreds of innocent railway passengers with the blessings of Maoist railway minister Mamata Banerjee, new fascists in the garb of intellectuals, social activists and foreign funded human right organisations of criminals and anti-national elements supporting, glorifying and justifying the Maoist perversion and brutality
The Polit Bureau of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) issued the following statement on January 15, 2011.
THE Polit Bureau expresses its deep grief and shock at the loss of over a hundred lives and injuries to many due to an accident and stampede in Pulmedu in Idukki district of Kerala. The incident involved pilgrims returning from the Sabarimala temple.
All steps should be taken to provide succor and relief to the survivors of the tragedy. The Polit Bureau conveys its heartfelt sympathy and condolences to all those families who have suffered a grievous loss.
At the beginning of the meeting of the Polit Bureau at Kolkata, a minute’s silence was observed in memory of all those who have died.
THERE is now enough ground to conclude that the January 7 incident in Netai village in Lalgarh was pre-planned. For the last two years, many families in Netai were forced to leave the village. It was a kind of a den of the Maoists and the so-called People’s Committee. The villagers were tortured in many ways and a number of CPI (M) cadre were killed. In Lalgarh block alone, 72 CPI (M) activists were killed in the last two tears.
On December 31, 2010, a mammoth meeting of the CPI (M) was held in Lalgarh after nearly two years. Nearly a lakh people participated. It was the height of people’s desperate resistance to the Maoists. Many villagers from Netai participated in the meeting though the village itself is still dominated by the TMC-and the People’s Committee. After the meeting, the homeless people started to come back.
It is now reported that on January 6 night, a group of Maoists and trained cadre of the People’s Committee entered the village. They were led by one Tanmoy Roy, a TMC activist. He was the bike driver of Chhatradhar Mahato, the leader of People’s Committee, now in jail. On January 7 morning, a team of Maoists along with TMC cadre attacked the houses of those who had returned. It was naturally resisted, resulting in clashes. According to the DIG (Western Range), Anil Kumar, there was “exchange of fire.” According to eye witnesses, the armed group that started the attack began to fire indiscriminately, killing and injuring many villagers. It is evident that they were instructed to fire randomly. What they wanted was dead bodies, not necessarily of whom. The post mortem report of at least three persons suggested that they were fired from the back side. Seven people were killed and 18 injured.
As a part of the anti-CPI (M) maligning campaign, they are now seeking to present the incident in a different way --- as if the villagers had encircled a house where ‘armed’ CPI (M) cadre had gathered and then the latter fired upon the unarmed villagers from inside the house or from the rooftop. It is a travesty of truth. If it had been so, many villagers won’t have died after receiving bullets from the backside. After the incident, moreover, the mediapersons who visited the village noted a large number of bullet marks on the walls of the house where the CPI (M) cadre had allegedly collected and also on the walls of the neighbouring houses. This indicates that in fact it is the CPI (M) cadre who were fired upon; it was not the other way round.
On the very next day of the Netai incident, PCPA spokesman Dileep Hansda gave an interview to a private TV channel, in which he confirmed that the incident was a result of the attack launched by his organisation and by the Maoists on its back. According to Hindi daily Jansatta, January 9, Hansda presented the incident as a big deed of his organisation, declaring that “the camps of the CPI (M)’s harmad vahini in West Medinipur, Purulia and Bankura will be razed to the ground. Hansda also announced that attacks on the CPI (M) camps would continue in future as well, adding that the police and administration would be responsible if anything untoward happens. Hansda labelled the accusation that the CPM has become active in Jangal Mahal because of its politics of vote.” However, as it happened in the Gyaneshwari case, Maoists later made Hansda keep silent.
Be that as it may, by the time the PCPA spokesman accepted the responsibility for this incident, the TMC, Congress and the media supporting them had got enough time to present the Left cadre as the oppressors while in reality they are facing the brunt of the TMC-Maoist attacks in Jangal Mahal area. On her part, TMC supremo Ms Mamata Banerjee was hell bent upon proving that there were “armed camps” of the CPI (M) in Jangal Mahal. On her behalf, parroting her accusation, the union home minister too has so far written three letters to the state chief minister. The incident in Netai was pre-planned to ‘prove’ that such camps are indeed there.
It is another thing that despite the iota of success that they have received, the TMC-Maoist grouping has not been able to mislead the people of Jangal Mahal area. On Saturday, January 8, TMC leaders were in fact chased away from Netai when they reached to oversee Ms Mamata Banerjee’s programme there. The railway minister, however, went there without much of a noise. She was scheduled to address a public meeting in Lalgarh. All preparations were made, including the erection of a big stage and security barricades. But the people’s response was so low that Ms Mamata Banerjee cancelled the meeting.
Courtesy: www.pd.cpim.org/
D.O. No. 119-CM
December 28, 2010
Dear Shri Chidambram,
Kindly refer to your secret letter dated 21/22 December, 2010 which had been published in the media before it reached my office on 27.12.2010 at 11 A.M.
Your assessment of the situation in the State of West Bengal is surprising and is far from an impartial overview of the situation. Maoists have spread from across the bordering states and with the help of small section of local people are creating problems mostly in 28 police stations in three districts of West Bengal. They are trying to create their own areas of dominance. They are indiscriminately killing political opponents and even innocent people. They are attacking police stations, police camps and looting arms. They are also engaged in large scale extortions and other unlawful activities.
You are fully aware of these activities of the Maoists. The greatest challenge is how to contain the Maoists and defeat them finally both administratively and politically.
In recent times State and Central Police through their joint efforts have achieved major successes. Peace and normalcy have been restored in vast areas. People who were evicted earlier are going back to their homes. Govt/Panchayat office are functioning normally and so are the schools, markets and shops. Life is gradually coming back to normalcy in these areas but still we have problem in the areas bordering our state. Trinamool Congress which was earlier maintaining secret contacts with Maoist leaders and outfits are now openly organising meetings with them.
CPI (M) and it allies are trying their best to resist the Maoists by mobilizing people against them and in the process have lost more than 170 of their workers and leaders. Unfortunately, you are now blaming them for the present state of affairs. I am afraid it will divert the attention of all concerned who are struggling against Maoists, the greatest threat to our internal security.
As regards political clashes mentioned in your letter I would like to correct your figures. 32 Trinamool Congress supporters have been killed and 601 have suffered injuries while CPI (M) have lost 69 of their cadres and another 723 have been injured. Indian National Congress has lost one of their supporters and 111 have been injured during the period mentioned in your letter. I, however, agree that it is not a happy situation and I am doing my best to stop these senseless killings. I have repeatedly appealed to all the opposition parties to cooperate. All the parties except Trinamool Congress have come forward to cooperate. Trinamool Congress has refused to talk to administration. I am trying to disarm and demoblise all armed groups engaged in violence in some pockets of the state.
I strongly object to your using the word “Harmed” to mean the CPI (M) party workers without knowing the actual meaning of this nasty word coined by Trinamool Congress leaders.
More when we meet.
With regards,
Yours sincerely,
Sd/-
Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee
Shri P. Chidambram
Union Home Minister
New Delhi-110 001
June to November 2010
684521.00
| S No. | Name and Address | Amount |
| 1. | Tripuramallu Ramalingeswara Rao, | 25000.00 |
| 2. | Dr. Srinivas, | 15000.00 |
| 3. | Dr. Lakshmanaswamy, Sajeevi Orthopedic, | 20000.00 |
| 4. | Chakka Gopala Krishna, | 10000.00 |
| 5. | Dr. P.V Manahor Rao, | 7000.00 |
| 6. | Dr. Subbanaidu, | 10000.00 |
| 7. | Dr. Ravibabu, Mediline hospital, Guntur | 10000.00 |
| 8. | Dr. G. Rajesh, | 7000.00 |
| 9. | Dr. J. Satish Babu, | 5000.00 |
| 10. | Dr. Subbarayudu, Pallvi theatre, Guntur | 5000.00 |
| 11 | Daruvu Subba Rao, Narasaraopet | 10000.00 |
| 12. | Bhaskara Rami Reddy, | 1000.00 |
| 13. | Ramineni Ankamma, | 10000.00 |
| 14. | Dr. N V K Prasad, | 10000.00 |
| 15. | Bathina Prasad, | 2116.00 |
| 16. | Dr. K Pullaiah Choudhar, | 2000.00 |
| 17. | Bayya Srinivas Rao, | 10000.00 |
| 18. | Annapurna Auto agency, Guntur | 50000.00 |
| 19. | | 10000.00 |
| 20 | Lakshimi Kantamma, | 10000.00 |
| 21. | Venkateswara Rao, | 10000.00 |
| 22. | Dr. Giri, | 5000.00 |
| 23. | Chaitanya Cold storage, Guntur | 10000.00 |
| 24. | Dr. T C Reddy, | 10000.00 |
| 25. | Dr. Kama Prasad, | 5000.00 |
| 26. | Y Mallikarjuna Rao, | 5000.00 |
| 27. | | |
Source: www.pd.cpim.org/